Tuesday, April 28, 2020

Iraq's Grand Ayatollah Sistani - Is he Irreplaceable?



The Day After Al-Sistani

Hassan Abbas,  Center for Global Policy, February 18, 2020

The world’s most prominent Shiite religious leader, Iraq’s Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, commands a great deal of influence and respect – not just in Iraq, but around the world. Questions about who will succeed the cleric and how the reportedly complicated selection process will unfold are being raised frequently, given his age – and perhaps because of the political instability and rising distress in Iraq and the broader region, especially since the U.S. move to effect regime change in Baghdad in 2003. The principal question is whether he is irreplaceable or if his successor can be expected to fulfill a similar moderating role in Iraqi politics and offer balance in the geopolitics between the United States and Iran. Should U.S. policy makers and strategists be concerned about the transition and succession of religious leadership?

Al-Sistani’s Appeal

Meeting al-Sistani in Najaf a few years ago was as inspiring as it was intriguing. Simple, straightforward and always to the point, al-Sistani’s discourse was highly instructive. After hearing my views on Middle East geopolitics, he calmly commented, “I neither agree nor disagree with your position.” I was left both curious about his views and in awe of his enigmatic persona. On my request for guidance in my research work on political history of Islam, all he said was, “A true scholar must avoid presenting his opinions as facts.”

It’s no surprise that al-Sistani’s patience and wisdom are widely seen as Iraq’s lifeline today, given his influence in the Shiite-majority country (few recognize that he is still an Iranian national; he has resided in the Iraqi city of Najaf since 1951). Any news about his ill health sends shudders across the country and among Iraq’s well-wishers in the region and around the world. Notably, both U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo and Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tweeted about their relief and well wishes for the 89-year-old al-Sistani after he underwent a risky but successful surgery for a fractured thigh bone recently. These expressions of good will came even though Tehran and Washington were aware of al-Sistani’s earlier condemnation of both countries’ recent strikes in Iraq.

For complete article, click here

Protecting Houses of Worship and Holy Sites - Hearing at the U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom


U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom Hearing at the U.S. Congress on Protecting Houses of Worship and Holy Sites 

October 23, 2019 - Testimony by Dr. Hassan Abbas

Introduction:

A house of worship is a sanctuary for reflection, spirituality and peace. It is a sacred space. A consistent pattern of attacks targeting these revered spaces across the globe is a highly condemnable and worrisome development. We have seen glimpses of this evil recently from Afghanistan to Sri Lanka, and New Zealand to the United States, with attacks on innocent and peaceful Christians, Buddhists, Jews and Muslims whose only crime was that they were praying to God as per their own traditions. But the attackers were not known as anti-religion per se. The question then, is what caused them to act in such a brutal and heartless manner? Simply put, the various attackers had different goals ranging from political and economic to ideology and identity, but despite such diversity of purposes they were bound together through their bigotry, intolerance and ignorance. One of the crucial challenges before us is to understand the contexts in which terrorists select places of worship as targets, as that will allow us to think more clearly about how to effectively prevent such attacks and counter the mindset that causes such mayhem.

For complete statement, click here; and to watch the proceedings of the hearing, click here
Also see:
Holy site security concerns international religious freedom panel - Washington Times, Oct 23, 2019

What are the progressive roots within Islam, and can they be strengthened?

Islam And Liberalism

What are the progressive roots within Islam, and can they be strengthened? A roundtable discussion. BY HASSAN ABBAS KEITH ELLISON ASRA Q. NOMANI ANI ZONNEVELD

Democracy - A Journal of Ideas, SUMMER 2016, NO. 4

Democracy brought together four prominent Muslim Americans who represent a range of progressive political viewpoints to ask them about the progressive roots of Islam, how the religion might revive those more liberal traditions, the extent to which Muslims and non-Muslims should criticize Islam, and more. The discussion took place on April 19, in Representative Keith Ellison’s Capitol Hill office. It was co-moderated by Democracy editor Michael Tomasky and Nation contributor Ali Gharib.

As we went to press, we asked the participants for their reactions to the Orlando tragedy, which are appended at the bottom of this article.

Michael Tomasky: First question. You’re all here because you are, to one degree or another, liberal and Muslim, and a lot of people—and I don’t mean Donald Trump voters, I mean readers of this journal—wouldn’t know how to square that. So I’d like all of you to explain, in your ways, how you can be both of those things. What is it in Islam that leads to and informs a liberal political point of view? Congressman, if you want to start.

Keith Ellison: Well, you know, in every surah in the Quran, it starts a certain kind of way: “In the name of the most merciful, the most compassionate.” So how in the world can you take that entity, that we say is the most merciful and the most compassionate, and not follow those same attributes? And to be compassionate and generous and kind, loving, honest, truthful. I don’t know if that’s liberal or not, but it’s what I’m trying to do. Failed plenty. But strive to do those things.

And I have a district where people have needs. As a politician I’ve got to solve problems. People are hungry, people don’t have food, people don’t have a place to live. I would like the foreign policy of my country to be just and right. Justice shouldn’t stop at the water’s edge, we should embody that. Not in an obtrusive way, but in a collaborative way. Certainly not in an exploitative and militaristic and forceful way. So, I mean, I guess if I’m a progressive or liberal as a Muslim, it comes naturally out of what my faith calls upon me to do.

And I’ll just say quickly before I turn it over. You know, I’m a black man from America. I was born in a Christian household. I was not born in freedom. When I was born in 1963, America did not allow black people to vote in large parts of it. The 1964 Civil Rights Act hadn’t come yet, the 1965 Voting Rights Act had not come yet. My children are the first black people in America born with all of their rights. And at an early age, I couldn’t square how I and Bull Connor could have the same religion. How could I and the racist conceive of the divine in the same way? It’s impossible. So eyes begin to search. Some African Americans found black liberation theology; others found Catholic social teaching—that’s what my mother found. I found Islam.

For complete article, click here

Sunday, April 26, 2020

Pakistan's Nuclear Bomb: A Story of Defiance, Deterrence and Deviance (2018) - Book Reviews and Events

 

Pakistan's Nuclear Bomb: A Story of Defiance, Deterrence and Deviance
Published by Hurst Publishers UK, Oxford University Press, USA and Penguin, India (2018)

Book Launch at the National Defense University, Washington DC with Peter Bergen as Discussant - March 6, 2018

Book Endorsements and Reviews:

"This is the most comprehensive study to date of why and how Pakistan got the bomb and proliferated. Beyond state actors--including China, Iran, North Korea and Libya--Abbas scrutinizes the role of individuals, including A. Q. Khan, in the making of Pakistan's nuclear program and its 'dissemination'."-- Christophe Jaffrelot, Visiting Professor of Indian Politics and Sociology at the King's India Institute and author of The Pakistan Paradox

Abbas’ diligent scrutiny of public sources and his intimate knowledge of Pakistani politics make this the most authoritative study yet written of Khan’s complicated story – By Andrew Nathan, Foreign Affairs (For complete review click here)

"This judicious study of Pakistan's acquisition of nuclear weapons, and their proliferation to Iran and North Korea . . . rigorously assesses the motives and actions of the relevant state actors as well as Khan and his largely European network of proliferators."- Choice

"As good a general analysis as you can get of Pakistan's nuclear ambitions, its nuclear weapons programme and the prevailing security mindsets and world view of its military, bureaucratic, scientific and political elites."-- Open Magazine

"An important contribution to history . . . measured and objective." Asian Affairs

"A masterly history of Pakistan's nuclear weapons program. Abundant with new historical evidence and theoretically nuanced (challenging traditional dogmas), Abbas has produced what may well be a definitive account of Islamabad and the bomb."-- Amitabh Mattoo, Professor in Disarmament Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University

"Abbas pulls back the veil on a largely un-known, illicit trade ... [his] intense historical analysis ... offers much needed clarity to a frightening and convoluted situation." -- NYU's Journal of International Law and Politics - For complete review click here

Book Event at Carnegie Endowment with George Percovitch and Corey Hinderstein - June 11, 2019


Book Reviews:
Carnegie Endowment, June 11, 2019 

One Screw Short by Owen Bennett Jones, London Review of Books - 18 July 2019

Book Review by C Uday Bhaskar, Financial Times, March 25, 2018
With Nobel Laureate Malala Yusufzai at Oxford

The Myth and Reality of Iraq’s al-Hashd al-Shaabi (Popular Mobilization Forces): A Way Forward


The Myth and Reality of Iraq’s al-Hashd al-Shaabi (Popular Mobilization Forces): A Way Forward
By Hassan Abbas
Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (FES) Amman Office September 2017 Amman, Jordan

The contrast was unforgettably awe-invoking: the spontaneous, unpredictable, revolutionary move, entrenched within the gentle, soulful aura of the city’s holiness. The glaring desert sun of Iraq was blazing with full energy, mirroring the people’s voices that took to the streets. It was the mid of June 2014, and the gradual transformation of al-Qaeda in Iraq into the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS) was no secret as Mosul had fallen a few days ago, casting a dark shadow upon the lives of millions of Iraqis. But just as heavy as that shadow was, there was an even greater cloud of resistance, pride, and defiance. All before my eyes. I stood on the sandy streets of Najaf as a mere visitor to pursue my study of the “new” Iraq, insignificant in the overwhelming spiritual essence that the atmosphere possessed. In front of me, the golden dome of Ali bin Abu Talib’s shrine glistened under the bright sky, beneath me sitting dust covered centuries of historical glories and tragedies. The spur-of-the-moment, gallant crowds that took marching to the streets, were making their way to the doors of the leading Shia cleric Ayatollah Sayyid Sistani, demanding a religious call to arms to protect their homeland. The self-proclaimed “Islamic State” was seen as expanding and Baghdad appeared vulnerable. Insightfully, Sistani implored citizens to join Iraq’s security services and the al-wajib al-kifai fatwa (religious injunction)1 issued for the purpose did not encourage any vigilante type action. But who cared to pay attention to the nuance at the time. All his followers heard was a religious call to action. Thousands of people strode with the confidence of their Mesopotamian ancestors, reclaiming the liberty they so desperately longed for. The embracing of their freedom was loud, vivacious, and symbolic. The years of Saddam oppression were over – their eyes heavy with determination, mouths uttering words of might and resilience. This was the moment when the idea of al-Hashd al-Shaabi, the Shia dominated Popular Mobilization Forces (PMF) was born. Sistani’s fatwa calling on Iraqis “to defend the country, its people, the honor of its citizens, and its sacred places” did the magic. I travelled to Iraq many times since then to follow the political, religious and security developments, and this policy brief is based on my personal observations and interviews with dozens of people who joined this movement, Iraqi politicians and members of Iraq’s official security forces. I had the opportunity to discuss Iraq affairs with experts and scholars in Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Turkey and Iran as well. Thanks to Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung’s office in Jordan and Iraq, an earlier draft of this paper was presented before a group of Iraqi politicians, government officials and representatives of various organs of PMF/Hashd in Baghdad in February 2017, to elicit their feedback. I am very grateful to the group for their insights and valuable critique for improving the paper. I am also very grateful to the respected Bahraluloom family of Najaf, and the two very learned Iraqi ambassadors to the Washington D.C. – former Ambassador Lukman Faily and present ambassador Fareed Yasseen – all of whom facilitated my trips to Iraq and shared their valuable insights.

For complete essay, click here

Women Fighting for Peace: Lessons for Today's Conflicts




Before the United States House of Representatives, March 22, 2016
Hearing: Women Fighting for Peace: Lessons for Today’s Conflicts

Testimony by Hassan Abbas, Professor National Defense University, Washington DC

Chairman Royce, Ranking Member Engel, and Members of the Committee: Thank you for inviting me to testify about the role of women in resolving conflict and securing peace. It is truly an honor and a privilege for me to contribute to this process. Let me begin with my principle belief: Expanding the role of women in civilian law enforcement as well as the broader criminal justice system is not a matter of inclusivity or gender equality alone. My research and experience - both as an academic and a police practitioner - in the United States and Southwest Asia convinces me that it is the key necessary element to open the doors of peace and harmony around the globe. It is especially so in conflict zones and regions facing socioeconomic turbulence and instability. Simply put, a broader and enlarged role of women in policing and countering extremism in South Asia, the Middle East, and beyond is a critical need of the hour. The US capacity building programs in developing states must further invest in creating awareness about this valuable enabling factor. Promoting and facilitating higher rate of recruitment of female police officers will have a direct impact on stability as well as counterterrorism capacity of partner nations in turn creating a more secure world for us all.

For complete transcript, click here, and for complete hearing, click here
For PBS story on the hearing, click here, and a for a Council on Foreign Relations story on the impact of the hearing, click here