Implications for U.S. if Musharraf is Ousted

Implications for U.S. in efforts to oust Pakistan PM
By Paul Wiseman, USA TODAY, august 11, 2008

Pakistani President Pervez Musharraf, viewed by the White House as a loyal ally in the war on terrorism, is fighting for his political life. His rivals in parliament could vote as soon as this week to impeach the former army chief and remove him from office.
USA TODAY's Paul Wiseman looks at the efforts to oust Musharraf, and what they might mean for the U.S. fight against al-Qaeda and the Taliban.

MUSHARRAF CRISIS: Pakistan's parliament convenes
Question: Why are Musharraf's opponents trying to remove him from office?

Answer: Musharraf's future has been in doubt since February, when a coalition of opposition parties gained control of parliament and vowed to remove him from office.

Musharraf's popularity has eroded under the weight of near-constant political and economic crises. Musharraf's democratic credentials have always been in doubt since he seized power in a 1999 coup, and he came under further scrutiny last year after he fired judges opposed to his rule and declared a state of emergency.

The government's U.S.-sponsored efforts to pursue Islamic militants are deeply unpopular and have led to near-constant violence, especially in the mountainous tribal areas along the border with Afghanistan. At least 100 militants have been killed in the last few days as Pakistan's military bombarded the area, the Associated Press reported.

In a poll of 3,484 Pakistanis released in June, the International Republican Institute found that just 11% approved of Musharraf and 85% wanted him to resign.

Musharraf spokesman Rashid Qureshi has said Musharraf will never quit.

Q. What are the charges in the impeachment case?

The specific charges are still being fine-tuned. But they may include a charge that Musharraf had siphoned off $700 million of the $1 billion in U.S. provided in annual military aid to Pakistan. That allegation was made in an interview with The Sunday Times of London by Asif Ali Zardari, who took over the Pakistan Peoples Party after the assassination of his wife, former two-time Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto.

Tariq Azim Khan, a Musharraf ally in parliament, dismissed Zardari's accusation as "absurd."In addition to the impeachment push, the legislatures of Pakistan's four provinces are voting this week on motions of no confidence against Musharraf. On Monday, lawmakers in in Punjab province voted 321-25, for the anti-Musharraf resolution. The vote even had support from 35 members of the main pro-Musharraf party, the Pakistan Muslim League-Q.

The provincial votes aren't binding — but are potent symbolically; Musharraf was elected to a second five-year term as president last year by a combination of national and provincial legislatures.

Q. Why is this happening now?

A. The Peoples Party,had balked at impeachment proceedings until shedding its misgivings last week. Lawyer Maneer Malik, a leader in pro-democracy protests last year, says Musharraf himself is to blame for the party's change of heart: The president had recently threatened to dissolve parliament, arousing the Peoples Party's ire.

Q. Will the impeachment drive succeed?

The coalition needs two thirds — 295 of 442 — of the votes in parliament to oust Musharraf. "This is a numbers game," Information Minister Sherry Rehman, long-time Peoples Party spokeswoman, said in an interview. "And we have more than the numbers we need" to push Musharraf out. Lawyer Malik predicts that as many as 75% of the votes will go against Musharraf.

"It is all a big bluff," counters Musharraf ally Tariq Azim Khan, who expects to coalition to come up well short of 295 votes.

Journalist Ahmed Rashid, author of the recent book Descent Into Chaos on the rise of Islamic militancy in Afghanistan, Pakistan and the rest of Central Asia, is among those who worry that the army might intervene to keep the former general in office. But Musharraf's replacement as army chief — Gen. Ashfaq Kiyani — has so far been reluctant to get involved in politics.

"We're not worried," Information Minister Rehman says. "The army has maintained a strongly professional stance since the new chief has taken over."

If the army stays on the sideline, Rashid says, Musharraf is "a goner and probably will resign" before being ousted.

Q. What impact would Musharraf's departure have on the war on terrorism?

Since Musharraf reversed Pakistani support for the Taliban after the 9/11 attacks on New York and Washington D.C., President Bush has viewed him as a staunch ally in the war on global terrorism. On Musharraf's watch, Pakistan has turned hundreds of suspected militants over to the United States and provided logistical support for U.S. military operations in Afghanistan.

Musharraf and the Pakistani military have been unable to stop pro-Taliban insurgents from staging suicide attacks across the country, from seizing territory in the tribal belt and from crossing the border to wage war against U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Musharraf has failed to rally public support against the militants. The Republican Institute poll found that 71% of Pakistanis believe Pakistan should not cooperate with the U.S. in the war on terror.

Journalist Rashid says that an elected civilian government might prove a lot more effective in uniting the public against the militants: "They haven't been tested yet," he says. "The test would come very soon if Musharraf were to go."

Wiseman reported from Hong Kong. Contributing: Zafar M. Sheikh and wire reports

Also see:
PAKISTAN: Musharraf lacks allies in impeachment fight - Oxford Analytica
Army, ISI to Stay Away from Impeachment - The News
It's Curtain time for Musharraf - By Najam Sethi, Wall Street Journal


suicide bombers zindabad. Kill these liberal Pakistani bastards. martyrdom is only for men with balls.

Popular posts from this blog

What happened between Musharraf & Mahmood after 9/11 attacks

"Society can survive with kufr (infidelity), but not injustice":

How to build an effective counter-narrative to extremism in Pakistan?