Focus: FATA

Fata is the place to fret about, US officials say
By Anwar Iqbal; Dawn, April 21, 2008

WASHINGTON, April 20: The US preoccupation with Iraq should not cloud American military planners’ ‘vision of threats’ emanating from Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (Fata), says Admiral Mike Mullen, chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff.

“Clearly, it’s where I would pick if I were going to pick a place where the next attack is going to come from,” he said. “That’s where Al Qaeda is, that’s where their leadership is, and we’re going to have to figure out a way to resolve that challenge.”

The admiral’s assessment of the situation in Fata, given during a talk at Washington’s conservative Heritage Foundation, reflects a new threat perception in America in which Fata occupies a central position.

Last week, President George W. Bush told ABC News that if another 9/11 attack were to be launched on the United States it would most likely be planned in Pakistan.

Earlier, CIA Director Michael Hayden said that Al Qaida had regrouped in the tribal borderland and appears to be planning another attack on the United States.

Another key US intelligence official, FBI Director Robert Mueller, warned that Al Qaeda operatives hiding in the tribal belt “won’t go away quietly in the night.”

This sudden emphasis on Al Qaeda’s presence in tribal areas followed bitter criticism of the Bush administration’s Iraq policies in Congress and the media.

The critics pointed out that 9/11 attacks were planned in Afghanistan, and not Iraq, and by diverting US resources to Iraq the Bush administration gave Al Qaeda a free hand to re-establish itself in Fata.

The administration countered this criticism by claiming that the war in Iraq was actually a war against Al Qaeda but there were not many buyers for this theory, which forced the administration to refocus on the threat from the tribal belt.

During the last 10 days, the new threat perception — Al Qaeda leaders in Fata planning another 9/11 — had been discussed at dozens of gatherings in Washington.

At briefings at the White House, the State Department and the Pentagon, administration officials agreed with the general perception that the threat was real and that the United States cannot afford to ignore it.

This was also emphasised at congressional hearings where some lawmakers advised the US administration to take immediate steps to deal with this threat.

Some in the media and at Washington’s think-tanks went a step ahead and urged the administration to take direct military action against suspected Al Qaeda targets inside Pakistan’s tribal belt.

But Admiral Mullen pointed out that the US did not have enough troops to undertake another major operation. He noted that while President Bush had pledged to send more troops to Afghanistan, their availability depended on the situation in Iraq.

This leads to another option; training Afghan troops to fight the militants. But Maj-Gen Robert Cone, Commanding General, Combined Security Transition Command-Afghanistan, told a recent briefing at the Pentagon that there were not enough Afghan troops to perform this “complicated” task in a “very, very difficult terrain.”

This leaves the Bush administration with one option: air strikes. Although US officials conceded that so far such strikes had not been very successful, they said that this was the only option the administration had if it wanted to capture a senior Al Qaeda leader before Mr Bush ends his tenure in January next year.


Anonymous said…
Verdict on graduates aka Lutere in Action aka Geo Bhutto Zardari Maze se Dubai men-Baqi Sab ko Marne DO

The News Sunday, April 20, 2008
A seven-judge Supreme Court bench is expected to give a verdict within days on whether the controversial clause laying down the possession of a graduation degree as a condition for legislators should be retained. The provision was put in place through an executive order which in 2002 was inserted into the Representation of People Act of 1976. Under this addition, any person must hold at least a degree of graduation or an equivalent qualification to be a member of the legislature. The question of whether 'sanads' issued by madressahs constitute an equivalent qualification is still pending before the court.

In the current situation, the verdict in the case will also decide several other key issues. Foremost among them is the matter of whether Asif Ali Zardari can contest an NA seat. A decision that keeps the graduation clause in place, either indefinitely or for the current assembly term, would act to, in all likelihood, keep Zardari out of the assembly. While the PPP co-chairperson has consistently stated he has no desire to become PM, speculation continues that he may eventually choose to move into the key decision-making slot himself. More
Anonymous said…
what has this comment to do with this article?
Anonymous said…
Doodh ka doodh Pani ka Pani.
Check this out

Popular posts from this blog

What happened between Musharraf & Mahmood after 9/11 attacks

"Society can survive with kufr (infidelity), but not injustice":

How to build an effective counter-narrative to extremism in Pakistan?