Campus protests spreading like wildfire?
Campus protests spreading like wildfire
* LUMS prof says movement ‘very significant’ as students not taking political sides, waiting for Opp to unite
* Student movements traditional centre of historical narrative of independence
Daily Times, November 16, 2007
Lahore: The steady rumbling of dissent on university campuses across Pakistan is an ominous development for the country’s military regime. Student activists in Pakistan have a history of effecting dramatic political change, according to a report in The Christian Science Monitor on Thursday.
What began last week as a protest against the arrests of academics at a university in Lahore has quickly spread across larger campuses, energising new movements and inciting old student political groups from near two-decade slumber. But, when opposition leader Imran Khan, a perceived hero of the student movement, arrived on Wednesday to address students in Lahore, members of a powerful and established Islamist student group quickly handed him over to the police. For Khan and others, targeting university campuses is a shrewd move. But his arrest reveals the scattered nature of the students’ potent political power. Unless the opposition can arrive at consensus, observers say, the movement will remain incoherent. At the core of this confused effort lies the clashing visions of the old student political groups with a new wave of activists who hope to effect a more profound shift in Pakistani politics.
‘Very significant, non-aligned’: “This ‘new student movement’ is very significant,” says Rasul Baksh Rais, a professor at Lahore University of Management Sciences (LUMS) who is a liaison between the administration and student leaders on campus. Rais added that students even snubbed former prime minister Benazir Bhutto when she invited them for a meeting. The students’ lack of interest in Pakistan’s premier opposition figure, Rais says, indicates that “until all parties are able to come on one platform it is unlikely these students will want to support one party over another.”
Whether Bhutto will eventually be able to seise the reins of such a unified movement remains a question, observers say. Security officials said she will likely remain under house arrest until Thursday, at least. On Tuesday, Bhutto called on the president to resign. Her spokeswoman told reporters on Wednesday that she is attempting to rally the political opposition, including former premier Nawaz Sharif, to present a more unified opposition to General Pervez Musharraf’s authority.
Musharraf said on Wednesday he expects to step down as army chief by the end of November, and begin a new presidential term as a civilian, warning that Pakistan risked chaos if he gave into opposition demands to resign. In an interview with the Associated Press, he accused Bhutto of fueling political turmoil and rejected Western pressure to quickly lift emergency rule, which he indicated was likely to continue through the January elections. “I take decisions in Pakistan’s interest and I don’t take ultimatums from anyone,” he said at his army office. Khan was one of the only prominent political leaders to have avoided arrest by going into hiding, and had sparked student activism by speaking at a university campus on the eve of the emergency. Through underground messages from hiding, Khan had called for a “youth army” to take to the streets. “My goal was to set in motion a student movement,” he said after his arrest.
Students became the latest ingredient in the urban street caldron – along with political party workers, lawyers, and civil society groups – after President Musharraf extended his sweeping security crackdown to academics. The arrests of two professors from LUMS, after the declaration of emergency last week, sparked immediate protests and the arrival of riot police at the campus gates. The agitation spread like wildfire to other smaller, private universities. Within a week, Khan visited Punjab University, the historic core of student activism, to try to harness the unwieldy power of the students. Shortly after his arrest, Khan told reporters that student “collaborators” had betrayed him to security officials. His surprising detention indicates that the youth movement is united only by its opposition to the current regime – and little else. “There is no greater ideology at work here that I can describe,” says Hashim bin Rashid, a LUMS student leader, dressed in all black and topped off by a black headband. The students at his campus, he says, are more inspired by larger concepts of social justice.
“It’s easy to turn a blind eye to everything going around you when you have a silver spoon stuck in your mouth,” he says. “But we are here because we have a stake in saving this country.”
Centre of historical narrative: This sentiment, admits Rashid, might not be what is driving students in older, more established student groups, which have been the breeding grounds for many of Pakistan’s old guard politicians. But, in a country that places student activism at the centre of its historical narrative of independence, student politics in any form has often been essential to carving the country’s political power dynamic.
In the 1960s, Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto toppled military ruler Gen Ayub Khan on the back of a seething student street movement. The early 1980s saw student groups target Gen Zia ul Haq’s regime, prompting him to ban student unions as part of an effort to depoliticise the schools.
But, some of the newer institutions have no experience with political activism. Their opposition to the military regime is defined by “a liberal ethos, a modernist structure of values,” that focuses on “constitutionalism, rule of law, and the independence of the judiciary, rather than identifying with any prevailing political party,” says Rais.
This new movement has awaked student activism after two-decades of depoliticalisation. While it remains germinal and incoherent, the students have the potential to help decide Musharraf’s fate – as other movements have done in the past. As the new non-aligned movement spreads to the traditional centres of student power, it’s likely to become more complicated – both for the students and the government they oppose.
Nadeem Farooq Paracha, a journalist who was active in student politics during the military rule of General Zia and was arrested several times for “anti-state” activities, sees this as a very different movement than that of the 1980s, when large state owned universities, not elite colleges, were the centre of activity. daily times monitor
Also See:Thousands march against IJT at PU: DT, Nov 16, 2007